文化IP赋能乡村振兴的逻辑理路、发展困境与优化路径基于米德、布鲁默的符号互动论视角

    The Logical Path, Development Dilemma, and Optimization Path of Cultural IP Empowering Rural RevitalizationBased on the Perspective of Symbolic Interactionism from Mead and Bloomer

    • 摘要: 符号互动论认为,社会是符号互动的总和,人们用语言定义彼此的行动,自我认同是在符号互动中生成的,社会规则在符号互动中发挥作用。基于符号互动论,文化IP赋能乡村发展需要提炼文化符号、培养互动场域、进行价值转化和重塑乡村规约。但乡村文化IP在发展过程中面临很多现实问题,主要表现在:符号构建异化,文化IP处于浅层开发与同质竞争中;互动效能弱化,阻断了主我与宾我通道;符号选择虚化,人才供给与创新不足;评价标准泛化,压抑主我与空壳发展。为了进一步发展乡村文化IP,就需要探索助推文化IP赋能乡村发展的新路径,这需要从如下方面展开:深耕文化根脉,实现文化差异化定位;聚合多元业态,拓展文化长效发展链;壮大人才队伍,提升文化发展创造力;丰富评估维度,培养文化发展内生力。

       

      Abstract: Based on the theory of symbolic interaction, empowering rural development with cultural IP requires extracting cultural symbols, cultivating interactive fields, transforming values, and reshaping rural norms. However, rural cultural IP faces numerous practical challenges during development, mainly manifested in: alienated symbol construction, cultural IP remains in superficial development and homogeneous competition; weakened interaction effectiveness, blocking communication between the master self and the guest self; the virtualization of symbol selection, with insufficient talent supply and innovation; and the generalization of evaluation standards, suppressing the true self and fostering empty shell development.To further develop rural cultural IPs, it is necessary to explore new paths to boost the empowerment of cultural IPs for rural development. This requires efforts in the following aspects: delving into cultural roots to achieve differentiated cultural positioning; aggregating diverse business forms to expand the long-term development chain of culture; strengthening the talent pool to enhance the creativity of cultural development; and enriching evaluation dimensions to cultivate the internal driving force of cultural development.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回