Abstract: As the modernization of national governance advances in depth, integrity governance faces a new challenge. By deeply empowering institutional rigidity, supervisory efficacy, and cultural identity through digital technology, a paradigm-shifting reconstruction of the “Three-Nots” anti-corruption mechanism becomes possible. At the institutional dimension, rule encoding drives the digitization of institutional procedures, enabling automated enforcement and procedural justice; continuous data feedback further optimizes institutional design, thereby reinforcing the hard constraints of “cannot corrupt”. At the supervisory dimension, comprehensive digital tracing of the exercise of power establishes a data-driven accountability system; algorithm-driven approaches enable intelligent early warning of integrity risks, while cross-domain platforms and public participation strengthen collaborative governance, enhancing the multi-layered deterrence of “dare not corrupt”. At the cultural dimension, precision-targeted integrity education reshapes cognitive frameworks; immersive scenario-based approaches convey the values of clean governance; and interactive platforms consolidate societal consensus on integrity, cultivating the endogenous moral consciousness of “do not wish to corrupt.” In addressing the ethical tensions inherent in technological application, integrity governance in the digital era must move beyond the myth of “technological determinism” and seek a balance between instrumental rationality and value rationality.